The Daily Shepherd News Network

My photo
Providing news and commentary that the Main Stream Media refuses to.

The Daily Shepherd



Leading the American “Sheeple” to once again becoming “We the People”.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Arizona's New Immigration Law with a common sense perspective.

If a very young looking person was partaking in the festivities at Marti Gras in New Orleans and was walking around drinking a beer like so many other thousands of people are doing, would it be “age discrimination” for a policeman to detain that person and demand to see some identification to verify that the person was not breaking the law by drinking under age? Wouldn’t the policeman have “reasonable suspicion” to believe the person is underage because this person appears to very young looking? Contrary to that, the Arizona law does not allow a policeman to just walk up to a person and demand to see immigration or citizenship papers. It is a “secondary” infraction meaning that the said person must first commit an infraction of the law in order to be detained where as the policeman can arbitrarily just walk up to someone in possession of alcohol and ask for ID to verify proper age to see if an infraction has occurred or not. People are saying that the Arizona law allows racial profiling and is discriminatory. Wouldn’t the above cited scenario be age discrimination and age profiling based on how young or old a person may look? The truth is, it’s a simple fact that 99.9% of all the estimated 496,000 illegal immigrants in Arizona come from south of the border. Regardless of what the politically correct crowd screams and whines about, that simple fact will not change by naming them differently such as calling them “undocumented workers”.

Drinking under the age of 21 is illegal just as entering the United States without going through the proper immigration process is also. So stop the crying and whining and stop the problem at the border. The Arizona law empowers authorities to actually do something about the problem. All states that have international borders should adopt similar legislation.

The underlying resentment about Arizona's new immigration law is that the people who oppose it actually desire these illegal immigrants to recieve amnesty and to have open borders, but this law is going in the other direction from that...towards where the majority of the American citizens want it to go. Round up and deport illegal immigrants and close the borders. Enough is enough already!

The following is NOT the new Arizona Law. It is EXISTING FEDERAL LAW THAT IS BEING IGNORED BY OUR PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS and the reason Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona hasn’t been indicted on federal discrimination laws. He is simply upholding FEDERAL law. Now he has STATE law to follow as well.


8 U.S.C. § 1325 : US Code - Section 1325: Improper entry by alien

(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts:Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

(b) Improper time or place; civil penalties:
Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of - (1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or (2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection.
Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed.

(c) Marriage fraud:Any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than $250,000, or both.

(d) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud:Any individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance with title 18, or both.

UPDATE: 2 May 2010

It is about time a news show other than Fox News reports the truth about the Arizona Immigration Bill!

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Is he or isn't he? The Birther question. The truth shall set you free


Whether or not you do or do not believe that President Obama is a natural born citizen as required by the US Constitution is irrelevant when he adamantly refuses to put the question about it to rest once and for all. It is hard to comprehend why Obama has been so obsessively secretive about his personal records, but it is now time for him to call off his lawyers and show the American public his cards. It would be the height of irresponsibility for the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces to be the source of destroying American military discipline. Permitting such an easily preventable situation to develop would very strongly imply that the man is not only ineligible for the office, but unfit for it as well.
The question about the Obama birth certificate is no longer one of conspiracy theory or hypothetical illegitimacy, as it now threatens to become a very serious military matter. Regardless of whether Barack Obama was born at the Kapi'olani Medical Center, at the Queen's Medical Center, in Kenya or in a manger, the issue will have to be conclusively settled in the near future.
What is truly troubling is the fact that everyone seems to believe that Obama had been “properly vetted” during the campaign. How could he have been when besides his actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records? He has spent almost $2 million keeping all of them sealed. Oddly, though congressional hearings were held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionally eligible to be president as a "natural born citizen," but no controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Obama's claim to a Hawaiian birth even though the question was asked dozens of times and law suits brought against him. So far all of them have been dismissed for “lack of standing.” In other words, no one is eligible to challenge his eligibility to be president apparently!
It is one thing for Obama to deny the curiosity of the American public by hiding behind the courts and lawyers, but it is very much another for him to deny the right of the men and women of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines, who are sworn to risk their lives upholding the Constitution of the United States of America, to be certain their orders are legitimate. Maybe through Lt. Col. Lakin’s self sacrifice, the truth will finally come to light. He will have a "right of discovery" during a court-martial – meaning Lt. Col. Lakin’s legal team could compel the Obama administration to produce proof of eligibility during the course of the government’s prosecution.




Did Michelle Obama let the truth slip out? Listen to what she says from 44 to 48 seconds into the clip…